|

 |
|
| 
I work on Diamond-Blackfan anemia
(DBA) at the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Department of Pediatric
Oncology in Boston, MA, in Dr. Colin Sieff's lab. The funding
from the DBA Foundation for my grant proposal "Phenotype-genotype
correlation in Diamond-Blackfan anemia" has enabled me
to screen DNA for ribosomal protein S19 (RPS19) gene mutations
from all DBA families from the USA and from outside the country,
who want to participate in the study. It also gives me an
opportunity to search for relationships between RPS19 mutations
and clinical symptoms in DBA. I work with research technician,
Ela Latawiec, who pursues blood samples, and with Drs. Donna
Neuberg and Shuli Li, the statisticians, who statistically
calculate the relationship between RPS19 genotype and DBA
phenotype. This project is conducted in collaboration with
the Diamon-Blackfan anemia registry run by Drs. Jeffrey Lipton,
Adrianna Vlachos, and Clinical Research Coordinator Eva Atsidaftos,
who evaluate clinical status and collect blood samples from
the patients and their family members.
The first DBA gene, RPS19 identified by Dr. Dahl's group is
mutated in approximately 25% of patients, however its role
in DBA remains unknown. The clinical heterogeneity of DBA
is still among the most challenging and poorly understood
aspects of the disease. Although severe anemia is a prominent
feature of DBA, mild anemia or only subtle indications of
the red cells abnormality such as increased MCV and/or elevated
erythrocyte adenosine deaminase activity are found in some
patients. In previous reports the clear correlation between
phenotype and a specific mutation was not found. However,
a recent study in the UK showed the possibility of phenotype-genotype
correlations with respect to hematological severity of anemia
and physical anomalies. To further address the question whether
there are correlations between genotype such specific RPS19
mutation or lack of these mutations and the clinical symptoms,
we undertook more detailed investigation based on larger group
of DBA patients.
Our objective is to sequence DNA from at least 400 unrelated
DBA patients for mutations in RPS19 gene. We expect to find
RPS19 mutations in approximately 100 patients and plan to
screen DNA from family members of these patients. We will
then investigate the relationship between RPS19 genotype and
the clinical symptoms, such as severity of anemia, response
to steroid treatment, different physical anomalies, and presence
of the malignancy in a family. These relationships may be
useful in genetic counseling allowing the prediction of the
clinical course of the disease in families with certain mutations.
The potential phenotype-genotype correlations may further
our understanding of the role of RPS19 protein in erythopoiesis
and development and the functional significance of specific
RPS19 mutations. Other comparisons will be clinical symptoms
in two groups of patients with and without the RPS19 mutations.
We will investigate whether there is a statistical difference
between these two groups of patients with respect to hematological
severity of the disease, physical anomalies, cancer, and evolution
of the disease over time.
Finally, we will create DNA and EBV immortalized lymphoblastoid
cell line repositories for further studies on DBA.
We are actively seeking patients and their families to participate
in this study. Participation will involve review of clinical
history and donation of approximately 3-5 ml (2 teaspoons)
of blood. Anyone who is interested in participating or in
learning more about the study, please contact Dr. Gazda at
any time by email (hanna_gazda@dfci.harvard.edu) or by phone
(617-632-3258).
Hanna Gazda, M.D.
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Pediatric Oncology, Rm M615
44 Binney Street, Boston, MA 02115
ph. 617-632-3258
fax: 617-632-6845
hanna_gazda@dfci.harvard.edu
|
Dr. Stefan Karlsson,
a researcher specializing in genetics, has been investigating
the possibility of developing gene therapy for patients with
DBA who have mutations in the Ribosomal protein S19 gene.
In order to continue and accelerate this research, Kr. Karlsson
needs more hematopoietic stem cells. Accordingly, he has asked
the DBAF to help him identify patients with a deficiency in
Ribosomal protein S19 who are willing to undergo peripheral
blood stem cell harvest. The peripheral blood stem cell harvest
is a relatively routine medical procedure.
Lund University
Institute of Laboratory Medicine, Lund
Department of Molecular Medicine and Gene Therapy
Stefan Karlsson, MD, PhD
Professor of Molecular Medicine
Director, Gene Therapy Center
July 14, 2004
Re: Stem Cells and Gene Therapy for DBA
Dear Members of the DBA Foundation:
I am writing to you to solicit your help. During the past
4-5 years we have been investigating the possibility of developing
gene therapy for patients with DBA who have mutations in the
Ribosomal protein S19 gene. The work has progressed well and
we have published tow recent papers which present evidence
for that gene therapy of RPS19 deficient DBA may indeed be
feasible (Hamaguchi et al, Blood, 100:2724-273 , 2002 and
Hamaguchi et al, Mol Ther 7:613-622, 2003). The progress of
the project has gone well scientifically, but we have difficulties
obtaining enough hematopoietic stem cells (stem cells that
can generate all blood cells) to do the required experiments.
Before we can apply to the authorities (FDA and equivalent
organizations in countries outside the US) to perform clinical
trials to develop gene therapy for DBA, we have to do many
additional experiments. So far, we have performed experiments
in culture that demonstrate feasibility to develop gene therapy
for RPS 19 deficient DBA but experiments in animal models
remain to be done before clinical trials begin. For these
animal experiments, we need hematopoietic (blood) stem cells.
In the published experiments, we have used stem cells from
the bone marrow of patients which have agreed to donate small
bone marrow samples for these studies. Unfortunately, we can
only obtain 2 million CD34+ cells (contain progenitor and
stem cells) from each patient and this is only enough for
one gene therapy experiment. Since we now need to transplant
gene-modified stem cells into appropriate animal models, more
stem cells are required. It is possible to harvest a lot of
stem cells from patients by mobilizing hematopoietic stem
cells from the bone marrow using growth factors. The stem
cells can thereafter be harvested from the blood stream in
a Blood Bank (Dept. of Transfusion Medicine) by having the
patient's blood flow through a leukapheresis machine that
separates the stem cells from other blood cells using principles
that are analogous to the ones that are used in a cream separator.
The advantage with this method is that many stem cells can
be harvested, approximately 100 times the number that can
be harvested by bone marrow aspirations under local anesthesia.
Dr. Cynthia Dunbar at the National Institutes of Health in
Bethesda has already harvested peripheral blood stem cells
from two DBA patients successfully and without complications.
We are now writing to ask the DBA Foundation to help us to
identify DBA patients with a deficiency in Ribosomal Protein
519 who is willing to undergo peripheral blood stem cell harvest
to help in the development of gene therapy for DBA. We are
looking for patients that are more than 12 kg in weight. The
peripheral blood stem cell harvest can be performed at the
NIH in Bethesda MD or in Lund, Sweden. Ninety percent of the
stem cells harvested at NIH by Dr. Dunbar will be stored frozen
and can be used at a later stage to treat bone marrow failure
or leukemia t a later stage, if required. Ten percent of the
cells will be used for gene therapy research. This is a protocol
that was established a few years ago to give patients an opportunity
to keep stored blood stem cells. The protocol in Lund will
be solely to develop gene therapy and all the cells harvested
will be used for gene therapy research aimed towards developing
a cure for RPS 19 deficient DBA.
We sincerely hope that you are willing to help us to identify
patients that want to help us to cure DBA.
Best wishes,
Stefan Karlsson MD, PhD Johan Richter MD, PhD
Professor of Molecular Medicine Senior Physician
The blood forming stem cells in the body normally reside in
the bone marrow but they can, under certain circumstances,
be mobilized to the bloodstream temporarily. One way to mobilize
stem cells from the marrow to the peripheral blood is through
treatment with a drug called granulocyte-colony stimulating
factor (G-CSF). G-CSF is a bone marrow stimulating hormone
produced in the human body under normal circumstances. By
giving this substance as daily subcutaneous injections for
4-5 days at somewhat higher doses than normally produced,
blood forming stem cells can be made to move from the marrow
out into the blood stream.
From the blood stream, these cells can be harvested through
a procedure called leukapheresis. During this procedure blood
is led through a leukapheresis machine which can separate
the portion of blood cells containing stem cells from red
blood cells, platelets and plasma which can be returned to
the individual in question. To gain access to the bloodstream
fro this procedure needles have to be inserted into veins
in both arms or into the large vein in the groin. The leukapheresis
procedure takes 3-4 hours and can normally be performed on
an outpatient basis. Mobilization and harvest of peripheral
stem cells has been a routine medical procedure for more than
10 years and it is performed on thousands of patients and
healthy stem cell donors all over the world every year.
The side effects from the above procedure are rare and mild.
Treatment with G-DSF can lead to mild to moderate bone pain
for a few days. Treatment with an ordinary pain killer can
alleviate this problem. Sometimes G-CSF treatment can lead
to a transient, harmless elevation of liver enzymes which
return to normal when the medication is stopped. The procedure
involves only a minimal blood loss and has not been shown
to affect the future blood forming capacity of the individual.
From a practical standpoint, participation in our study involving
harvest of peripheral stem cells from patients with Diamond-Blackfan
Anemia and mutation in RPS19 will first include a medical
check-up including a physical exam, electrocardiogram and
blood tests. If all of these are satisfactory the person can
be included in the study. G-CSF can be administered in the
home of the patient as a subcutaneous injection for 4-5 days.
The leukapheresis can then normally be performed as an out-patient
procedure.
The part of the stem cells harvested under this program that
will be used for gene therapy research cannot be returned
to the individual in question even if the gene transfer experiments
performed are successful. However, we hope that our research
will help pave the way for future clinical gene therapy of
Diamond-Blackfan Anemia.
Lund, Sweden
July 14, 2004
Johan Richter Stefan Karlsson
Associate Professor Professor
Department of Molecular Medicine and Gene Therapy
|
Our Thanksgiving baby truly gives us a
real reminder each year how much we have to be thankful for.
Joshua Lorenz was born Thanksgiving weekend 1992. Thankfully
he was our second born. I knew something was wrong carrying
him. He rarely moved and never kicked. Maybe itĖs a girl,
I thought, remembering how I would cry from the pain of carrying
our first son who kicked nonstop under my rib cage. It was
scary and very different having hardly no movement.
I gained over sixty pounds, and Josh weighed
a hefty 8 pounds 10 ounces that afternoon he was born. "Josh's
vitals are fine," I was told. Luckily we were blessed with
a nurse, Barb Weber, that went beyond the call of duty to
make sure things were all right. I remember Barb telling us
that she was running "a test." She just thought our baby was
a little pale. I was pale, too. She said it was probably nothing
to be concerned with because his vitals were fine. Nurse Barb
came back and said, "Sorry they made a mistake running the
test. TheyĖll have to run it again." I didnĖt think anything
of it.
Josh looked fine and healthy. I remember
a relative asking "Is everything all right? Your nurse seems
to be a little concerned and is checking on Josh a lot." By
the time nurse Barb came back the third time it was later,
and Greg and I were by ourselves. The mood had definitely
changed. The first two tests canĖt be right. WeĖre running
a third. When Barb entered the room with the third test results
she was holding back tears and apologizing. We owe our sonĖs
life to nurse Barb Weber. If she would not have run that simple
test early on we would not have been alerted to the distress
Josh was under. His hemoglobin was dropping fast. The specialists
at our hospital said it was out of their league. It was touch
and go. We were not allowed to see our baby. We were told
"There is no room for you while we are working on him." Josh
was being transferred and an ambulance was enroute with the
needed NICU medical staff. When the NICU staff arrived, they
told us exactly the way it was Û no chocolate covering. To
be told that after giving birth - that your child may die
Û I couldnĖt believe it. It was almost midnight and our baby
was enroute to the needed hospital and hooked up to all kinds
of machines. Greg and I wrestled to let them release me to
be able to travel to the new hospital to be with our son.
With all the commotion and not knowing how to get to the new
hospital, we were in awe that we beat the ambulance that left
much earlier than us.
We found out months later that Josh had
to be revived while enroute. If Nurse Barb would not have
caught it (which the NICU doctors said was a miracle) then
Josh would have been wrapped up; when they would have gone
to check on him, he would already have passed on. All I could
think of was SIDS (Sudden Infant Death Syndrome). They revived
Josh, and he got three transfusions over time. He was strong
as ever after getting the transfusions Û he even pulled out
his breathing tube! He looked so big in those cubicles, 8
pounds 10 ounces next to 1 and 2 pound babies. After one week
he came home. Big brother Tyler (20 months old) had mixed
emotions. Has Mom abandoned me for my new little brother?
Life just started to get over the roller coaster event when
Josh started sleeping nonstop-not even to eat. Looking pale,
I took him into our regular doctor. He said I was overreacting
and that there is nothing wrong with Josh! Yeah I thought,
"You didnĖt even run the test I asked you to run!" Luckily,
I called the NICU doctor that took care of Josh. He knew something
had to be done and spoke with me about what was needed. He
stated "I just told your regular doctor the same advice just
before you called." I was fortunate to have consulted the
NICU doctor. Our regular doctor called shortly after, and
he told a different story from what I was told by the specialist.
I confronted him that what he said was not what the specialist
recommended. He stated that he did not agree with the specialist
and that there was no need for what was recommended. I was
outraged. Within minutes I had a referral from the NICU specialist
and an appointment for Josh to see the new doctor. That decision
saved JoshĖs life.
Within a couple of days I went from being
told that I was overreacting to being told that if I had waited
another ten days Josh would have been dead. JoshĖs original
doctor could have cost Josh his life. I learned a very valuable
lesson. I am the one responsible for my sonĖs care. And because
I have the greatest concern for my child, I am my childĖs
greatest advocate. JoshĖs hemoglobin was once again dangerously
low. We were told Josh needed a bone marrow tap to find the
cause. Anesthesia was not recommended because they thought
the anesthesia could cause problems. The bone marrow confirmed
what Dr. Shahidi at UW ChildrenĖs Hospital in Madison suspected.
I remember Dr. Shahidi telling Greg and I that Josh had Diamond-Blackfan
Anemia. Dr. Shahidi explained DBA to us and Josh started on
the steroid regimen. Josh was steroid responsive. Then, Valentines
week of 1995 Josh was hospitalized with RSV. 1995 was a difficult
year. Josh went to the doctor over 70 times which did not
include hospitalizations. We were told we may lose Josh again.
We frantically hoped that JoshĖs older brother was an HLA
match for bone marrow. They were not a match. On a weekly
basis I was asked to consider having another baby in hope
that the stem cells from the umbilical cord would be a match
for Josh. We were under so much stress in 1995 that a baby,
we felt, would be too much. Our lives revolved around doctors
and Josh.
In June we switched to a stronger steroid-
dexamethasone. Then we added cyclosporin to enhance the stronger
steroid even more. Friday of Labor Day weekend I could feel
Josh slipping away. On September. 6, 1995 Josh got his first
blood transfusion since the week he was born in November of
1992. His hemoglobin went from 4.5 to 7.4. We continued with
the higher dose medicines in hope that his bone marrow would
bounce back. We sought other medical doctors in the DBA field
for advice. Fortunately, very late in October, our doctor
found an article and got the protocol for an experimental
treatment by Dr. Bernini for intravenous methylprednisone
treatment. In November we knew the medicines were not working
at all. We started to begin weaning him of all medicines and
began blood transfusions. In the spring we would begin this
new protocol. During the winter of 1995 we let his body heal,
his immune system get stronger, his bones heal, and all the
side effects from the medicines dissipate. The 1996 year would
be about hope and fear. January and February we prepared.
Baselines were done, surgeries performed, and a portacathe
put in for treatment. And importantly, we talked with parents
whose children had completed the original protocol. We learned
from them what to expect and to prepare for. We would have
not been emotionally prepared if it wasnĖt for all the DBA
families that we have a close bond with. And then, March came.
We started the protocol in March. Within
six days we saw his retics jump up. On day nine, his retics
were 6.2 with a hemoglobin (hgb) of 8.7. On day 13, his retics
were 6.3 with a hgb of 9.3. On day 15, his retic count was
4.5 with a hgb of 10.1. Fortunately, Josh had very minimal
side effects. Many were not as lucky. We continued on with
the protocol. Home health care came out to our home so I could
learn daily care for Josh. His daily blood pressure was monitored
and daily intravenous medication was mixed with the saline
solution bag. It was not uncommon for Josh to get up and start
doing his vitals after he got his breakfast. Near the end
of breakfast, I hooked up his IV and started the IV pump for
his medicine. On May 2, we switched to oral prelone. On May
23, we switched to an even weaker oral steroid. On February
17, 1997, we were unable to access his port for labs. We couldnĖt
access it for several weeks so Josh then had his chest portacathe
removed as it only served as a threat of infection. By this
time Josh was stable. We continued to reduce his steroids
much slower. Three times we tried every other day steroids.
Thankfully, our doctor insisted that we keep trying. Josh
needed his medicine bumped up for the initial every other
day until his body got used to it. Once we recognized that
Josh was not bottoming out, we started seeing the side effects
that we were accustomed to seeing fade away. Josh started
to grow, and we started to lower his every other day steroid.
For the last two and a half years we have not reduced his
steroids. Josh has been weaning himself by gaining weight.
His normal hgb is in the 8-9 range. When Josh was on the experimental
protocol we lived in a bubble. We were afraid of catching
anything because of his immune system being compromised by
long term high dose steroid use. We are less concerned about
the little sniffles now. There will always be that twitch
in the bottom of my stomach reminding me that all it takes
is one episode with pneumonia, RSV, or chicken pox to send
us back down to that roller coaster. |
|
 |
|
|